Posted by Sarah Kliff at 02:00 PM ET, 04/07/2012 TheWashingtonPost
(Waltraud Grubitsch - AFP/Getty Images) The data seemed, at first
glance, like it could be indicative of a medical miracle. Between 2009
and 2010, thousands of British men turned up at hospitals to be treated
for many pregnancy-related services, things like obstetric exams and
midwife services. All told, there were 17,000 of them.
Was "Junior" (the 1994 classic where Arnold Schwarzenegger conceives)
happening in real life, and en masse? A team of researchers in London
conceded that these statistics did indeed "seem to reveal some
interesting service developments."
Rest assured, a wave of male pregnancy has not swept Britain. Instead,
researchers studying the data think they're the result of something way
more boring: medical coding errors. Mistakes in data entry are,
admittedly, a much less exciting development than a rash of pregnant
men. But it's one that poses as much of a challenge to modern medicine
as a would learning to understand male conception.
This research, published as a letter this week in the British Medical
Journal, was meant to draw attention to how much data gets entered
incorrectly in the country's medical system. These guys weren't turning
up at the doctor for pregnancy-related services. Instead, they were at
their doctor for procedures that had medical codes similar to those of
midwifery and obstetric services. With a misplaced keystroke here or
there, an annual physical could become a consultation with a midwife.
"We suspect that the numbers may, at least partly, reflect data errors,"
write Laura Brennan, Mando Watson and Robert Klaber. "Some of these may
be due to similarities in the main specialty codes."
Right now, the health care industry here in the United States is engaged
in a fierce debate about how we should code our medical procedures. We
use something called the International Classification of Diseases or, in
medical jargon, the ICD. It's pretty much a laundry list of codes that
describe various diagnoses and medical procedures.
Providers currently use the ninth version of the ICD, which has about
18,000 medical billing codes. The government has been trying to move the
system onto the newer, 10th version of the ICD, which has a lot more
codes, about 140,000 of them.
There's been a lot of fighting over whether we should move to the new
ICD. Critics say that it's everything that's wrong with American health
care: too many codes, too bureaucratic and aggressively regulated.
Supporters contend that using the new data will provide more granular
information about how we use health care, allowing for better data analysis.
One strike against moving to the new system, however, is that it could
create a country with a lot more accidentally pregnant men. With 140,000
medical codes to choose from, each denoting a very specific medical
condition, there's a pretty wide margin for error. Putting the pros and
cons of male conception aside, it does seem like one concern to keep in
mind as the country debates moving to an increasingly complex system for
organizing our medical data.
--
"One Touch In BOX"
To post : koran-digital@googlegroups.com
Unsubscribe : koran-digital-unsubscribe@@googlegroups.com
"Ketika berhenti berpikir, Anda akan kehilangan kesempatan"-- Publilius Syrus
Catatan : - Gunakan bahasa yang baik dan santun
- Tolong jangan mengiklan yang tidak perlu
- Hindari ONE-LINER
- POTONG EKOR EMAIL
- DILARANG SARA
- Opini Anda menjadi tanggung jawab Anda sepenuhnya dan atau
Moderator Tidak bertanggung Jawab terhadap opini Anda. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~------------------------------------------------------------
"Bersikaplah sopan, tulislah dengan diplomatis, meski dalam deklarasi perang sekalipun seseorang harus mempelajari aturan-aturan kesopanan." -- Otto Von Bismarck.
"Lidah orang berakal dibelakang hatinya, sedangkan hati orang dungu di belakang lidahnya" -Ali bin Abi Talib.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
Catatan: Hanya anggota dari blog ini yang dapat mengirim komentar.